| 
                  
                    |  |  
                   
                     
                       | June 12, 2023 Preparing Applications in  Uncertain Conditions |  
                       | May 8, 2023 Competence is a Delicate Flower |  
                       | March 30 , 2023 Urgent! Very Hard to Meet a Limitation Period |  
                       | March 13 , 2023 Parties to Planning Appeals |  
                       | March 7 , 2023 Costs in Family Law Litigation |  
                       | January 30 , 2023 Dodging Settlement Privilege |  
                       | January 4 , 2023 Lurking Dangers and Errors |  
                       | January 3  , 2023 Your Real Goals |  
                       | December 5 , 2022 Contracts for Higher Costs |  
                       | November 24 , 2022 Scope of Offers to Settle |  
                       | October 13 , 2022 Checklist for Cross-Examination |  
                       | September 16  , 2022 Reviewing Latest Changes |  
                       | August 22 , 2022 First Steps in Problem Solving |  
                       | July 28  , 2022 Checklist of Powerful Procedural Principles |  
                       | March 22  , 2022 Repeating a Cross-Examination Question  |  
                       | January 25 , 2022 Enforcing Land Sales Becomes Easier  |  
                       | January 5 , 2022 Proving a Settlement After a Mediation  |  
                       | November 16, 2021  Types of Injunctions |  
                       | October 1, 2021  Orders After Litigation is Over  |  
                       | August 11, 2021  Discoverability for Limitation Periods  |  
                       | August 5 , 2021  Releases of Claims   |  
                       | June 7 , 2021  Language Used Still Matters   |  
                       | May 17  , 2021  Serving Uncooperative People  |  
                       | April 15  , 2021  Death and After-Life of Contingency Agreements |  
                       | February 22 , 2021  Legal Analysis |  
                       | February 2  , 2021 Costs Clarified at Last |  
                       | January 4 , 2021 Urgent! |  
                       | December 10, 2020 Traps and Confusion in Service Times  |  
                       | November 24, 2020 Don't Cut Corners  |  
                       | October 2  , 2020 Consent Orders  |  
                       | August 4 , 2020 Electronic Hearings  |  
                       | July 21, 2020 Ceasing to Act  |  
                       | June 29, 2020 Writing Skills  |  
                       | June 29, 2020 Keeping Up With the Law |  
                       | June 22, 2020 Assets as a Test for Security for Costs |  
                       | June 19, 2020 What is This Case About? |  
                       | June 11, 2020 Cross-Examining Child Witnesses  |  
                       | May 20 , 2020 Formal Offers |  
                       | May 13 , 2020 Vexatious or Self-Represented Litigants |  
                       | January 7, 2020 G.S.T. and Costs |  
                       | December 20 , 2019 Electronically Navigating the Handbook
 |  
                       | October 7 , 2019 Questioning is a Bad Word |  
                       | July 29  , 2019 Dismissal for Delay |  
                       | May 7 , 2019 Rule 4.31 Fallacies |  
                       | March 18  , 2019 More Dangers in Oral Fee Agreements |  
                       | February 11 , 2019 Weir-Jones Decisions |  
                       | January 9 , 2019 Discouraging Settlements |  
                       | November 30, 2018 European Court Helps You Twice? |  
                       | November 23 , 2018 Courts Overruling Tribunals |  
                       | November 16  , 2018 New Evidence on Appeal |  
                       | October 30 , 2018 Schedule C's Role |  
                       | July 17  , 2018 Loopholes in Enforcing Settlements |  
                      | May 7 , 2018 Enforcement of Procedure Rules 
 April 16, 2018 Limping Lawsuits are OftenDoomed
 
 April 3 , 2018 Court of Appeal Tips forSummary Decisions
 
 March 19, 2018 Serious Dangers in Chambers  Applications
 
 February 13 , 2018 Court Backlog  
 December 18 , 2017 Lowering the Status of  Courts 
 September 15 , 2017 Access to Court Decisions  
 July 4 , 2017 Strictissimi Juris 
 June 14 , 2017 Why Don't Your Clients Settle?  
 June 5 , 2017 Gap in Rules About Parties 
 June 5, 2017 Personal Costs AgainstSolicitors
 
 April 26, 2017 Clogged Courts  
 April 11, 2017 Dismissal for Want ofProsecution
 
 January 6, 2017 Incomplete Disclosure  
 December 15, 2016 Mediation 
 November 23, 2016  Is Contract Interpretation Law?  |  | 
              
                | Welcome  
 
                      
                        |  Côté’s Commentaries   © J.E. Côté 2016-2023 |  
                      
                        | PREPARING APPLICATIONS IN UNCERTAIN CONDITIONS  |  
                      What were the best ways to prepare written materials for an application are set out in my Systematic Advocacy book. But recent problems in the Alberta courts add to the topic. Now things take longer, there can be small puzzles, getting answers or correcting little errors is harder, and deadlines are more dangerous. (See my blog dated March 30, 2023, and the upcoming September 2023 issue of the Stevenson & Côté Handbook.) So here are a few more tips to make the process go better and avoid disasters. 1. Early in the life of a file, warn your client in writing about (a) deadlines, (b) how long it will take to do the work to meet the deadlines,
 (c) the bad effects of missing a deadline, and
 (d) how many weeks before certain events you would need instructions, in order to take effective action in court.
 
 2. You will have to carry out several tasks simultaneously. So a team approach and some delegation is very often desirable. If your office has someone very good with detail, paperwork, and organization, try to get some help from that person. Sometimes solicitors have more such skills than do barristers. Often only one (or part of one) task requires a detailed knowledge of the issues. Someone should prepare a folder or binder or electronic document giving the relevant sections of statutes, Rules of Court, Practice Directions, court website Announcements, and notes of unpublished changes, for the procedure for a certain general class of applications. Some of the types of work to be done may be fairly mechanical, having to do with timing, logistics, and the latest procedures (or backlogs), rather than with the merits. 3. Project management skills are very useful. Above all, you must not wait to start what you think is step 4, until after steps 1, 2, and 3 are completed. Any task which has no preconditions, or whose preconditions are now met, should be started at once. Try to detect more or less what is one path, i.e. a string of steps, each of which is a precondition to the next step, so that a delay in one delays all later steps in that long string. For example, do not wait until the end of the process to produce formal covers or end sheets for documents, whether these are electronic or paper (or both). You know their contents at the outset, so prepare them at the outset. When you identify strings of steps, try to see which string is the critical one. In other words, which string will take longer (even if all goes well) than the other strings take. 4. If no one in your office has prepared a court application in the last 60 days, someone should now become acquainted with all the actual on-the-ground processes and practicalities (and maybe shortcuts). Learn all that even before the client has definitely approved bringing an application or decided just what it will complain about or ask for. 5. List all your people and your client's people who may have to approve things, authorize things, provide evidence, or swear oaths. Then ensure that all of them will be available all through the process. Make sure none is likely to go on holiday or a voyage. Get now from each of those people every possible location, email address, cell-phone number, etc. which might be used (permanently or temporarily) to reach them. Learn reliably whether it will be possible to exchange documents, including pdf form or fax. 6. Try to learn how to contact someone in the court administration who can give you advice or help if you have a query or if something goes wrong. Someone who could look at a draft of a document and say early if it has problems of form, would be valuable. If you cannot find someone in the court administration, find a lawyer in another firm who files such documents frequently and knows what and when the courts will accept. It cannot cost that big a fee for advice on logistics or form.      – Hon. J.E. Côté |  
                | The Commentaries are intended to call the attention of lawyers to promising or threatening developments in the law, in civil procedure, in developing their skills, or simply to describe something curious, funny or intriguing.  The Hon. Jean Côté retired from the Court of Appeal of Alberta and would be willing to act as an arbitrator, mediator, or referee under Rules 6.44 and 6.45 of the Alberta Rules of Court.  He may be contacted through Juriliber at: email: info@juriliber.com or phone 780-424-5345.
 |  |