| 
                  
                  
                    |  |  
                     
                       | June 29, 2020 Keeping Up With the Law 
 |  
                       | June 22, 2020 Assets as a Test for Security for Costs 
 |  
                       | June 19, 2020 What is This Case About? 
 |  
                       | June 11, 2020 Cross-Examining Child Witnesses  
 |  
                       | May 20 , 2020 Formal Offers 
 |  
                       | May 13 , 2020 Vexatious or Self-Represented Litigants 
 |  
                       | January 7, 2020 G.S.T. and Costs 
 |  
                       | December 20 , 2019 Electronically Navigating the Handbook
 
 |  
                       | October 7 , 2019 Questioning is a Bad Word 
 |  
                       | July 29  , 2019 Dismissal for Delay 
 |  
                       | May 7 , 2019 Rule 4.31 Fallacies 
 |  
                       | March 18  , 2019 More Dangers in Oral Fee Agreements 
 |  
                       | February 11 , 2019 Weir-Jones Decisions 
 |  
                       | January 9 , 2019 Discouraging Settlements 
 |  
                       | November 30, 2018 European Court Helps You Twice? 
 |  
                       | November 23 , 2018 Courts Overruling Tribunals 
 |  
                       | November 16  , 2018 New Evidence on Appeal 
 |  
                       | October 30 , 2018 Schedule C's Role 
 |  
                       | July 17  , 2018 Loopholes in Enforcing Settlements 
 |  
                      | May 7 , 2018 Enforcement of Procedure Rules 
 April 16, 2018 Limping Lawsuits are OftenDoomed
 
 April 3 , 2018 Court of Appeal Tips forSummary Decisions
 
 March 19, 2018 Serious Dangers in Chambers  Applications
 
 February 13 , 2018 Court Backlog  
 December 18 , 2017 Lowering the Status of  Courts 
 September 15 , 2017 Access to Court Decisions  
 July 4 , 2017 Strictissimi Juris 
 June 14 , 2017 Why Don't Your Clients Settle?  
 June 5 , 2017 Gap in Rules About Parties 
 June 5, 2017 Personal Costs AgainstSolicitors
 
 April 26, 2017 Clogged Courts  
 April 11, 2017 Dismissal for Want ofProsecution
 
 January 6, 2017 Incomplete Disclosure  
 December 15, 2016 Mediation 
 November 23, 2016  Is Contract Interpretation Law?  |  |  |   
              
                | Welcome  
 
                      
                        |  Côté’s Commentaries    © J.E. Côté  2016-2020  |  
                       You need to keep up with developments in the law. You do not always have to become fully familiar with some legal topic or new development. You need to know that it exists, and what sort of things it might affect. And recognize what fact situations might trigger it.  Why is keeping up with recent case law important? For 7 reasons:  
                        Now courts are more venturesome and unpredictable; some rulings are counterintuitive.New decisions remind you of law you half forgot.When reading a new case, ask yourself how the fight arose: did some lawyer give careless advice? Or was some lawyer caught by an argument or development unexpected and hard to foresee?You learn what sort of people are litigating these days, and about what. For example, are employers still suing former employees for stealing clients or secrets?You learn what sort of things are hard to prove, and what evidence is or is not strong enough to win. Solicitors need to know that.You learn more signs of a crank or totally unreasonable litigant or client.You see disputes and rulings which you or your opponents might adapt or apply by analogy, though on the surface they do not seem to apply to you or your clients. You may confine your practice to one or two fields, but most judges do not: they hear every type of case.
                         Headnotes for court decisions help. They quickly tell you which cases are likely totally irrelevant to you. And they reveal a useful point buried amidst irrelevant topics. But for most courts, you cannot get headnotes quickly, or free. Hard-copy law reports with headnotes are now harder to access, more expensive, and offer only a small fraction of decisions. Does your law firm subscribe to a commercial website of court decisions with headnotes, which site is fairly prompt and complete? Reading it might be a good compromise. Occasionally, borrow a new edition of a textbook, look at the table of contents, and spend a few minutes on a chapter or two which display many recent citations. Do not let your eyes get bigger than your tummy. Too ambitious a reading goal will make you fall behind, get discouraged, dislike such reading, and end up not reading any law at all. Pare down your selection criteria to what is manageable. Then stick to it. Devise a personal procedure which ensures that you keep up. Having to look through a whole month's decisions from your province's superior courts is likely too discouraging.  – Hon. J.E. Côté   The Commentaries are intended to call the attention of lawyers to promising or threatening developments in the law, in civil procedure, in developing their skills, or simply to describe something curious, funny or intriguing.  Justice Côté recently retired from the Court of Appeal of Alberta and currently acts as an arbitrator, mediator, or referee under Rules 6.44 and 6.45 of the Alberta Rules of Court.  He may be contacted through Juriliber at email: info@juriliber.com or phone 780-424-5345. |  
                |  |  |