| 
                  
                    |  |  
                   
                     
                       | May 16 , 2024 How to Meet Court Deadlines |  
                       | April 15, 2024 Recycling Old Evidence or Records |  
                       | April 10, 2024 Poor Record Disclosure Bites  |  
                       | April 3, 2024 History of the Drop-Dead Rule  |  
                       | March 26 , 2024 The Aims  and Results of Costs |  
                       | March 18 , 2024 More Troubles Filing and Serving Court Documents |  
                       | March 14 , 2024 Precedents About Facts  |  
                       | March 11  , 2024 Question of Law or Fact? |  
                       | February 29 , 2024 Disclosure in Chambers |  
                       | February 21  , 2024 Not Attending a Hearing |  
                       | January 31 , 2024 The Suggestions Box |  
                       | January 2 , 2024 Plain Language for Lawyers  |  
                       | December 15 , 2023 Limitation Periods Have Shrunk  |  
                       | November 30 , 2023 Advocacy's Key |  
                       | November 28 , 2023 Motions Fritter Away Time and  Money |  
                       | November 27 , 2023 Will Foreclosure History Repeat  Itself? |  
                       | November 21 , 2023 Rules of Court Bind Even  the King's Bench  |  
                       | November 2, 2023 Records and Affidavit of Records  |  
                       | November 2  , 2023 Uncommon Law  |  
                       | October 20 , 2023 Expanding Judicial Review Evidence |  
                       | June 22, 2023 Competition v. Benefits |  
                       | June 19, 2023 Clogged Courts |  
                       | June 12, 2023 Preparing Applications in  Uncertain Conditions |  
                       | May 8, 2023 Competence is a Delicate Flower |  
                       | March 30 , 2023 Urgent! Very Hard to Meet a Limitation Period |  
                       | March 13 , 2023 Parties to Planning Appeals |  
                       | March 7 , 2023 Costs in Family Law Litigation |  
                       | January 30 , 2023 Dodging Settlement Privilege |  
                       | January 4 , 2023 Lurking Dangers and Errors |  
                       | January 3  , 2023 Your Real Goals |  
                       | December 5 , 2022 Contracts for Higher Costs |  
                       | November 24 , 2022 Scope of Offers to Settle |  
                       | October 13 , 2022 Checklist for Cross-Examination |  
                       | September 16  , 2022 Reviewing Latest Changes |  
                       | August 22 , 2022 First Steps in Problem Solving |  
                       | July 28  , 2022 Checklist of Powerful Procedural Principles |  
                       | March 22  , 2022 Repeating a Cross-Examination Question  |  
                       | January 25 , 2022 Enforcing Land Sales Becomes Easier  |  
                       | January 5 , 2022 Proving a Settlement After a Mediation  |  
                       | November 16, 2021  Types of Injunctions |  
                       | October 1, 2021  Orders After Litigation is Over  |  
                       | August 11, 2021  Discoverability for Limitation Periods  |  
                       | August 5 , 2021  Releases of Claims   |  
                       | June 7 , 2021  Language Used Still Matters   |  
                       | May 17  , 2021  Serving Uncooperative People  |  
                       | April 15  , 2021  Death and After-Life of Contingency Agreements |  
                       | February 22 , 2021  Legal Analysis |  
                       | February 2  , 2021 Costs Clarified at Last |  
                       | January 4 , 2021 Urgent! |  
                       | December 10, 2020 Traps and Confusion in Service Times  |  
                       | November 24, 2020 Don't Cut Corners  |  
                       | October 2  , 2020 Consent Orders  |  
                       | August 4 , 2020 Electronic Hearings  |  
                       | July 21, 2020 Ceasing to Act  |  
                       | June 29, 2020 Writing Skills  |  
                       | June 29, 2020 Keeping Up With the Law |  
                       | June 22, 2020 Assets as a Test for Security for Costs |  
                       | June 19, 2020 What is This Case About? |  
                       | June 11, 2020 Cross-Examining Child Witnesses  |  
                       | May 20 , 2020 Formal Offers |  
                       | May 13 , 2020 Vexatious or Self-Represented Litigants |  
                       | January 7, 2020 G.S.T. and Costs |  
                       | December 20 , 2019 Electronically Navigating the Handbook
 |  
                       | October 7 , 2019 Questioning is a Bad Word |  
                       | July 29  , 2019 Dismissal for Delay |  
                       | May 7 , 2019 Rule 4.31 Fallacies |  
                       | March 18  , 2019 More Dangers in Oral Fee Agreements |  
                       | February 11 , 2019 Weir-Jones Decisions |  
                       | January 9 , 2019 Discouraging Settlements |  
                       | November 30, 2018 European Court Helps You Twice? |  
                       | November 23 , 2018 Courts Overruling Tribunals |  
                       | November 16  , 2018 New Evidence on Appeal |  
                       | October 30 , 2018 Schedule C's Role |  
                       | July 17  , 2018 Loopholes in Enforcing Settlements |  
                      | May 7 , 2018 Enforcement of Procedure Rules 
 April 16, 2018 Limping Lawsuits are OftenDoomed
 
 April 3 , 2018 Court of Appeal Tips forSummary Decisions
 
 March 19, 2018 Serious Dangers in Chambers  Applications
 
 February 13 , 2018 Court Backlog  
 December 18 , 2017 Lowering the Status of  Courts 
 September 15 , 2017 Access to Court Decisions  
 July 4 , 2017 Strictissimi Juris 
 June 14 , 2017 Why Don't Your Clients Settle?  
 June 5 , 2017 Gap in Rules About Parties 
 June 5, 2017 Personal Costs AgainstSolicitors
 
 April 26, 2017 Clogged Courts  
 April 11, 2017 Dismissal for Want ofProsecution
 
 January 6, 2017 Incomplete Disclosure  
 December 15, 2016 Mediation 
 November 23, 2016  Is Contract Interpretation Law?  |  | 
              
                | Welcome  
 
                      
                        |  Côté’s Commentaries   © J.E. Côté 2016-2024 |  
                      
                        |                           HOW TO MEET COURT DEADLINES  |  
                      Scheduling, filing, and serving applications and statements of claim with courts is now complex. That interacts with time limits for doing so. The danger of missing an obvious time limit is very real.  Often the deadline is tight simply because of the time it takes to gather the information, draft papers, and get affidavits sworn. When the client first gives instructions to sue or make the application, often the time is not yet short.  So here are five suggestions you could try, to reduce the danger of filing or serving too late.                       
                        
                           
                            Leave nothing until the last day; you or your computer might fall ill that day. 
                           
                            Your documents will probably be prepared on a computer. So start the drafting process at once, especially all the formal parts like styles of cause. As each piece of information is obtained, fill it in on the existing draft. Make sure that everyone who will be needed to do something, such as swearing or signing, will be available on very short notice on the critical days. 
                          
                            At a very early stage, you or some other very reliable person should consult the court concerned, to determine the exact address and procedure needed to schedule and file, especially if doing so gets close to the deadline. If the court is the Court of Appeal, contact the case management officer in the relevant city (Edmonton or Calgary). And figure out well in advance precisely to whom or where to serve the filed documents. It may be better to serve more than one way, e.g. serve a person in charge, and also leave at the proper office or address. 
                           
                            If a copy of the document endorsed to show filing is not available in time for service deadlines, serve a copy without the endorsement, and then serve again a copy with the endorsement once that endorsed copy becomes available from the Registrar or Clerk. If there is more than one way to file or serve, use each method, to play it safe. And to persuade a judge later, that you took all the steps humanly possible. 
                          Have two people attend on making the key steps such as booking (scheduling), filing, and serving. Each should check to find mistakes or misspellings, especially in computer addresses. And later that will give you a choice of who can swear a procedural affidavit, in case there arises a later dispute about whether deadlines were met or not, and how. The lawyer knowing all the privileged secrets is not an ideal witness to give affidavit evidence. – Hon. J.E. Côté    |  
                | The Commentaries are intended to call the attention of lawyers to promising or threatening developments in the law, in civil procedure, in developing their skills, or simply to describe something curious, funny or intriguing.  The Hon. Jean Côté retired from the Court of Appeal of Alberta and would be willing to act as an arbitrator, mediator, or referee under Rules 6.44 and 6.45 of the Alberta Rules of Court.  He may be contacted through Juriliber at: email: info@juriliber.com or phone 780-424-5345.
 |  |